The head of the All-Ukrainian public organization “Union of Officers of Ukraine” Oleksandr Sasko reacted to the post of the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Dmytro Lubinets on Facebook regarding his position on the call-up of a scientist to the ranks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. As reported by the PromPolitInform portal, Sasko wrote about this on the social network.
The PromPolitInform portal, in agreement with the head of the SOU, cites his arguments.
“The Commissioner for Human Rights was outraged by the call-up of a scientist to the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Mr. Lubinets! You should not be outraged by anything. You have legal tools that you probably know how to use. Or maybe you don’t.
So, upon such an appeal, you, YOU, should open proceedings, within three days (and not a month or three months, as you know how) to understand the situation and submit a petition for the restoration of violated rights.
In this case, the available information contains information, and does not prove the fact of the violation. Translate information about the violation of rights into the fact of the violation. Provided that the fact is confirmed, submit a petition for the restoration of violated rights.
In this case, the violated rights can be restored by the senior chief of the CCC, within whose authority the cancellation of the draft order is within the power. In this case, the optimal path to CSR.
That is, instead of writing posts on Facebook, you should sign a petition to the Commander of the Ground Forces, hand the document personally into the hands of a profile representative and, in fact, within two hours, as they say, settle the situation.
You took four actions, only one of which is effective – you accepted the appeal. The rest – you used Facebook, reported to the Supreme Court and the Prosecutor General. This is nothing more than information noise. The desire to show everyone that you are supposedly very concerned about defending the rights of a scientist.
“You actually created only a soap bubble, and did not prove that you were really outraged and did everything to protect human rights. Serious cases are not resolved this way,” – states Oleksandr Sasko.
